Menu
Confronto multi-pneumatico : confronto di 2 pneumatici con dati di test condivisi

Vredestein Ultrac vs Kumho Ecsta HS52

Questo confronto analizza 6 test indipendenti su pneumatici in cui tutti i 2 pneumatici sono stati testati insieme, fornendo un'analisi diretta testa a testa.

Classifica

RangoPneumaticoVittorieDisegnaPerdite
1Kumho Ecsta HS52510
2Vredestein Ultrac015

Ripartizione per categoria

Dry Braking [M] (lower is better)
Dry Handling [s] (lower is better)
Dry Handling [Km/H] (higher is better)
Subj. Dry Handling [Points] (higher is better)
Wet Braking [M] (lower is better)
Wet Braking - Concrete [M] (lower is better)
Wet Handling [s] (lower is better)
Wet Handling [Km/H] (higher is better)
Subj. Wet Handling [Points] (higher is better)
Wet Circle [m/s] (higher is better)
Wet Circle [s] (lower is better)
Straight Aqua [Km/H] (higher is better)
Curved Aquaplaning [m/sec2] (higher is better)
Subj. Comfort [Points] (higher is better)
Noise [dB] (lower is better)
Wear [KM] (higher is better)
Value [Price/1000] (lower is better)
Value [Price/1000] (lower is better)
Price (lower is better)
Rolling Resistance [kg / t] (lower is better)
Fuel Consumption [l/100km] (lower is better)
Abrasion [mg/km/t] (lower is better)

Test inclusi in questo confronto

Tyres in this comparison

Quick specs plus how they fared in the shared tests.
2
Vredestein Ultrac
Vredestein Ultrac
Autovettura passegge · Estate · Alte prestazioni
8.1/10 score22 reviews
3rd
Best result
P10.83
Avg finish
0-1-5
W/D/L
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Autovettura passegge · Estate · Turismo Premium
8.7/10 score21 reviews
2nd
Best result
P4.33
Avg finish
5-1-0
W/D/L