Menu

Vredestein Ultrac vs Kumho Ecsta HS52

2 pneumatici a confronto 6 test condivisi Estate
Vredestein Ultrac
Vredestein Ultrac
Estate · Alte prestazioni
Tyre Reviews8.5
Tyre Reviews Scoreout of 10
0
Wins
1
Draw
5
Losses
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Estate · Turismo Premium
Tyre Reviews9.0
Tyre Reviews Scoreout of 10
5
Wins
1
Draw
0
Losses

Regola la ponderazione della categoria

Adatta l'importanza di ogni categoria di prestazione per vedere come le diverse priorità influiscono sulla classifica generale in tutti i test condivisi.

Asciutto 35%
Bagnato 50%
Comfort 5%
Valore 10%
Asciutto 35% · Bagnato 50% · Comfort 5% · Valore 10%
Ottimizzare le sottocategorie
Asciutto
Bagnato
Comfort
Valore
RangoPneumaticoPuntoAsciuttoBagnatoComfortValore
1Kumho Ecsta HS5298.5%99.9%97.3%97.4%100%
2Vredestein Ultrac96.2%98.5%99.6%99.7%69.8%

Ripartizione per categoria

Analisi dettagliate

Dry Braking [M] (lower is better)
Dry Handling [s] (lower is better)
Dry Handling [Km/H] (higher is better)
Subj. Dry Handling [Points] (higher is better)
Wet Braking [M] (lower is better)
Wet Braking - Concrete [M] (lower is better)
Wet Handling [s] (lower is better)
Wet Handling [Km/H] (higher is better)
Subj. Wet Handling [Points] (higher is better)
Wet Circle [s] (lower is better)
Wet Circle [m/s] (higher is better)
Straight Aqua [Km/H] (higher is better)
Curved Aquaplaning [m/sec2] (higher is better)
Subj. Comfort [Points] (higher is better)
Noise [dB] (lower is better)
Wear [KM] (higher is better)
Value [Price/1000] (lower is better)
Value [Price/1000] (lower is better)
Price (lower is better)
Rolling Resistance [kg / t] (lower is better)
Fuel Consumption [l/100km] (lower is better)
Abrasion [mg/km/t] (lower is better)
Record di vittorie/pareggi/sconfitte test per test
RangoPneumaticoVittorieDisegnaPerdite
1Kumho Ecsta HS52510
2Vredestein Ultrac015
Test inclusi in questo confronto